Category Archives: Willis Eschenback

Watt about doubling the burn?

Willis Eschenbach has a new post on Watts Up With That (WUWT) called Double the burn – Scotty. In this post he calculates how much we would need to increase our use of fossil fuels in order for the per … Continue reading

Posted in Anthony Watts, Climate change, Global warming, Watts Up With That, Willis Eschenback | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 24 Comments

Watt about John Cook and the atom bombs?

Not surprisingly, Watts up With That (WUWT) has a post mocking John Cook’s recent quote that the increase in energy associated anthropogenic global warming (AGW) is the same as 4 Hiroshima bombs per second. As I showed in yesterdays’s post, … Continue reading

Posted in Anthony Watts, Climate change, Global warming, Watts Up With That, Willis Eschenback | Tagged , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Watt about the ground rules?

If you’ve read some of my earlier posts you may know that I have tried commenting on Watts Up With That (WUWT) posts and, because of the response my comments received, I no longer comment on WUWT posts. To a … Continue reading

Posted in Anthony Watts, Climate change, Global warming, Willis Eschenback | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 15 Comments

Watt about the Sea Surface Temperature?

I don’t want to discuss this in too much detail as Sou over at HotWhopper has already done quite a thorough job. Basically, however, there is a recent Watts Up With That (WUWT) post called by land and by sea. … Continue reading

Posted in Anthony Watts, Climate change, Global warming, Watts Up With That, Willis Eschenback | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Watt spurious varvology?

The most recent post on Watts Up With That is by Willis Eschenbach, is called Spurious varvology and discusses a recent paper by Martin Tingley and Peter Huybers (Tingley & Huybers, 2013, Nature, 496, 201-205). Their paper uses instrumental data, … Continue reading

Posted in Climate change, Global warming, Watts Up With That, Willis Eschenback | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment